![]() ![]() ☆ Auto-boost: boost automatically under RAM available & timing conditions ☆ Gentle: kill only apps that uses considerable memory ☆ Medium: kill apps that consumes memory above an “average” ☆ Strong: Kill apps that is low priority as well as consume lightly below an “average” ☆ Aggressive: kill most of low priority apps RAM Speed Booster comes with auto-boost in 4 levels: aggressive, strong, medium, gentle. That’s not always run at an appropriate time, causing low responsive apps, lagging,Įspecially when you launch a new app after heavily browsing web pages. #Mac ram booster androidAndroid task manager will selectively kill low priority tasks in order to reserve memory to higher priority task. Most of Android devices bundle with limited memory. The most beautiful part of this app is a small, configurable widget that places on top of any app and one-click to RAM boost. Ram Cleaner helps to save battery power and extend battery life by hibernating running apps. After boosting your mobile, you can run a speed test to see how much faster it is. One Tap Boost helps to speed up phone by freeing up RAM. Keep your phone safe from insecure public WiFi. Ram Cleaner added WiFi Security feature to detect fake WiFi and unauthorized connection. Introducing a safe task killing mechanism in Android. Comes packed with a task killer that kills tasks without crashing killed apps. Ram Speed Booster cleans your RAM in just one click.įull control of your RAM usage. #Mac ram booster macIf you’re considering whether to buy the entry-level or the higher-end model, our Speedmark 8 results show that the $799 model was 25 percent faster overall, with the biggest gains being in MathematicaMark and Cinebench CPU, which were 78 percent and 53 percent faster, respectively, than the new $599 Mac mini.Ram Speed Booster is one of the highest rated Speed Booster app in Google Play. On the other hand, the previous high-end model, with its discreet AMD Radeon HD 6630M graphics, was faster on GPU-intensive tests, like Portal 2 (9 percent more frames per second) and Cinebench OpenGL (24 percent more frames per second). MathematicaMark was 78 percent faster on the new system, Cinebench CPU tests took 53 percent less time to complete, and HandBrake was 24 percent faster than the old model. The older system took nearly three times as long to complete our Photoshop action script.Īs you’d expect, processor-intensive tests that can use all four cores (and eight virtual cores, thanks to the Core i7’s Hyper Threading technology) showed the new high-end Mac mini to be much faster than the 2011 high-end Mac mini with a dual-core 2.5GHz Core i5 processor. The 2012 Mac mini was 68 percent faster and finished the Cinebench CPU test in half the time of the 2010 model. We also looked at the performance differences between the new low-end model and a mid-2010 entry-level Mac mini with a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo processor. The new Intel HD Graphics 4000 helped the 2012 low-end Mac mini beat last year’s system by 60 percent in the Cinebench OpenGL test and by 27 percent in Portal 2. In our testing, we found the new $599 Mac mini to be 31 percent faster overall than its predecessor. As with last year’s $799 system, the new model comes with 4GB of RAM and a 5400-rpm, 1TB hard drive. This new model drops the discreet AMD graphics found in last year’s step-up system in favor of Intel’s integrated HD Graphics 4000. The new $799 Mac mini has a 2.3GHz quad-core Core i7 processor the previous high-end Mac mini used a dual-core Core i5. The new $599 Mac mini still uses integrated graphics, but is updated from the previous Intel HD Graphics 3000 to Intel HD Graphics 4000. The new $599 Mac mini has the same 5400-rpm 500GB hard drive and 4GB of RAM as the 2011 entry-level Mac mini, but it gets a speed bump from its previous 2.3GHz dual-core Core i5 processor to a 2.5GHz dual-core Core i5. Interestingly, the hard drive tests were much faster on the new systems, though they still use 5400-rpm hard drives. The new systems were faster in all of our tests, but processor intensive tests results were only slightly higher. The Macworld Lab was able to get our hands on the new Mac mini systems and our Speedmark 8 test results show the new machines are between 31 and 37 percent faster overall than the Mac minis they replace. ![]() Last week, Apple refreshed the Mac mini with faster processors, faster USB 3.0 ports and new graphics. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |